[ all ] [ g / s / fur / art / 3dcg / f / rp / req / p2p / dis / lit / kaki ] [ SEARCH ]

/dis/ - Discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

The site was updated to be a lot faster. Some things are still being updated. If you have questions or suggestions, see this thread

File: 1587828602284.jpeg (90.46 KB, 900x623, 1536981723952.jpeg)

 No.11633

Do you think of yourself as a psycho?

Somehow I don't.
Certainly, my tastes are unusual, but they have a clear internal logic behind them. And I have limits too – I can't stand to see the jaw split from the rest of the head, and would much prefer the face stay undamaged.
My odd tastes are purely 2D, or literary, in nature. Though I have tried to force myself to watch videos on like LiveLeak or somewhere, just to test the boundaries (which perhaps speaks to some other psychological pathology), it's impossible. My stomach can't handle it.
So I think that my tastes are linked to dehumanizing the characters portrayed. It makes perfect sense, after all, because dehumanization as a fetish is how I got here (pet girls -> slave girls -> girls as sex toys -> amputees -> guro -> cannibalism).
In any case I don't see my tastes as an issue requiring psychologist intervention (though I'm not about to find out if a psychologist would disagree or not).

 No.11638

I find that situation pretty interesting.
because if you dehumanize someone then you are essentially fapping on your refrigerator.
Yes it may still look like a human but it is not a human.
In general, it looks like something more related to domination and a sense of self-worth and security or maybe hate.
In my situation, the problem with my tastes was that I see them as something extremely stupid and it still sometimes looks stupid, because when you rationally think about something like cannibalism you just can't understand the reason why one would want to cook a cute girl and what do you do next. Same about other stuff where it is just so stupid and pointless even if it looks sexy.
but that's a typical problem with all sex stuff because whats we do is totally absurd and pointless.

As for being psyho, I think that is what every respectable human should be able to turn on demand. Maybe some training is required.

 No.11806

File: 1588029200228.png (4.15 MB, 1732x2309, 1585960879758.png)

>>11638
I certainly don't think it's hate. There are days when I like cute cozy vanilla porn where the orgasm is accompanied by an "I love you". My taste varies widely. It depends on my mood - when my aunt passed away I couldn't touch guro for a while.
>if you dehumanize someone then you are essentially fapping on your refrigerator.
I think part of it is that I've never actually dated a woman or even tried (I've thought "a gf might be nice" but never enough to bother). So you could say that the only sexual attraction I've ever felt has been for my laptop screen or phone screen. (I'd probably consider seeing a psychologist for that, if I could only handle a little embarrassment.)
Anyway, for me, the common thread between pet girls and cannibalism as I described is the girl giving up her personhood for the sake of someone else. (Whether I prefer this willing or unwilling is a question of my mood.) I find the concept of this to be very hot from either POV - the one who dehumanizes the girl or the girl dehumanized. (Not the guy dehumanized, except in cases like giantess unbirthing. But if the guy's a trap it's fine.)

>when you rationally think about something like cannibalism you just can't understand the reason why one would want to cook a cute girl and what do you do next.

I think of the senselessness of the act as almost part of the charm.
Something I've been doing recently is a lot of worldbuilding around this cultural institution wherein a class of girls are trained to die horribly for the delight of a crowd. I've found it fun to try to explain away all the obvious issues ("Wait, don't they need their girls to become mothers? Why would parents willingly enroll their kids into this? … Maybe the sacrificial girls are to some degree self-sustaining? Or maybe they've got access to modern medicine while remaining something of an Aztec-ish or Roman-ish society, so life is oddly cheap").
One of my favorite images in recent times has been this one. I think part of the appeal of cannibalism is a misfire of neurons between appetite and lust, and this image is one of few I've found that actually make the cooked girl look really tasty (using techniques that wouldn't be out of place in a fast food commercial).

 No.11808

I'm scared that I may become so desensitized that I do become a psycho. I don't want to actually hurt anyone even if I have violent fantasies sometimes.

 No.11824

>>11808
>I'm scared that I may become so desensitized that I do become a psycho. I don't want to actually hurt anyone even if I have violent fantasies sometimes.

You care about not hurting others way too much to be psyho ;)
I do not care about that at all and still would not consider myself a psyho.
But it is all about consequences. as I know, psychos are the people who just do not care about the consequences of their actions and that's all how they differ from everyone else. I don't think you can be desensitized to consequences fo your fantasies. It will require pretty strong personality change to make you not care about the fact that murdering someone will actually make them dead and they won't come back after you cum.
If there would be a way to solve that small problem I would be murdering people left and right LOL although what is the point if they do not die?

I have a pretty extreme problem with thinking about consequences even in fantasy. Some other people have no problems imagining themselves being dead, their corpse being violated or buried, and for me, death means just end, the blank screen where everything ends. even in the fantasy, I cannot imagine things continuing beyond death.
and it is interesting that most other people do not really was to talk about that because it is something that does not compute.

>Anyway, for me, the common thread between pet girls and cannibalism as I described is the girl giving up her personhood for the sake of someone else.

Yes that's also an interesting situation because I wonder why do you like a girl doing that at all? Do you like the idea of serving someone/something or feel pleasure from the idea that this somehow makes you important?
I usually feel exactly opposite and rather want girls to be mischievous and selfish I do not want her to serve anyone or sacrifice for anyone.
I noticed that women around me like when people do things for them to make sacrifices even small ones and men are more likely to be willing to serve and make thsoe sacrifices so I guess it may be something related to this desire and probably you are not really that unusual in your tastes.
I just cannot really understand why it is like that and how it works.
Probably it also has some real-life implications as it seems to represent personality types.

 No.11827

>>11824

Thanks man.

 No.11832

>>11824
I really don't think it has to do with imagining myself as the benefactor of the girl's dehumanization. It would be hot to be either the dehumanizer or the dehumanized for me (I mean theoretically. I'm sure I wouldn't actually enjoy being cannibalized. Maybe just a little slave play). The only reason it's gotta be a girl or trap who gets dehumanized is that I don't want to look at porn focused on a guy.
I mean, I can also find selfishness hot (the girl takes advantage of you), perhaps because I've never had the misfortune of having a controlling gf.



[Return][Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ all ] [ g / s / fur / art / 3dcg / f / rp / req / p2p / dis / lit / kaki ] [ SEARCH ]